Find quality deterioration earlier
Bring process, product, supplier and historical context together before variation becomes an escape.
QAI performs defined quality-analysis work across supplier, process, customer-complaint and warranty evidence. It prepares findings and investigation priorities while authorised quality professionals retain approval authority.
Validate material and process parameters on the affected machine before expanding containment.
Illustrative product-output example. Values and findings are not customer results unless a published case study is linked below.
QAI reviews SPC, supplier evidence, PPAP, complaints and warranty information, then prepares findings and investigation priorities. Quality professionals retain technical validation and approval while repetitive analysis continues at scale.
Bring process, product, supplier and historical context together before variation becomes an escape.
Reduce repetitive evidence gathering, cross-checking and case preparation around quality decisions.
Apply the same evidence-led review discipline across growing case volumes, plants and suppliers.
Quality volume grows faster than manual review capacity. Delayed evidence creates more escapes, repeat complaints, late closures and Cost of Poor Quality.
At the Oragadam operation, the warranty team handled four times the analysis volume and moved closure from 78 days to within the 45-day SLA. The team reported 50× faster analysis and workflow processing with QAI assistance.
QAI supports repetitive evidence review and investigation preparation. Quality engineers, customers and authorised approvers retain technical validation, disposition and closure decisions.
Move from detecting variation to knowing where to investigate.
Identify deterioration earlier and help reduce scrap, rework and customer-escape risk.
Quality engineers validate causes, containment and disposition.
Review supplier evidence before a documentation gap becomes a production problem.
Reduce repetitive verification and surface incoming-material risk earlier.
Authorised personnel retain hold, release and escalation authority.
Reduce the engineering effort behind PPAP preparation and supplier review.
Fewer review iterations and more engineering time for higher-value quality work.
Responsible engineers and customers retain approval authority.
Turn evidence gathering into a structured investigation.
Faster, more consistent complaint investigation with clearer evidence.
Engineers validate root cause, action effectiveness and closure.
Review each claim with the available service, product and manufacturing evidence.
Faster claim handling, less leakage and better visibility into recurring field failures.
Authorised teams retain approval, rejection and recovery decisions.
Start with one operating decision, connect the evidence already available and expand as value becomes visible.
Which product or process risk threatens customer requirements?
Where is a quality escape most likely to occur?
Which issue carries the greatest customer and COPQ exposure?
Has the corrective action actually reduced recurrence?
Continuous quality-governance brief
Prioritised product and process risks
Evidence mapped to customer requirements
Quality-escape and COPQ exposure
Recommended investigation with human validation
Connect directly where data is accessible. Use EdgeVISS where operational data is trapped inside machines, controllers or industrial protocols.
Deploy in the architecture that fits the plant, data-governance and latency requirements. Access remains governed and operational experts retain decision authority.
See how QAI assisted quality analysis and workflow audit as a warranty team handled four times the case volume with human approvals.
QAI can analyse evidence from the quality systems you already operate. Qualitiviss is available where teams also need SPC, PFMEA, PPAP, NCR and corrective-action workflows.
Begin with one dataset, one recurring problem and one decision your team needs to improve.
Start QAI Trial